Althouse

1590 R. Greene Neuer too Late ii. sig. K2 Dildido dildido, Oh loue, oh loue, I feele thy rage romble below and aboue...

I'm going to assume "loue... loue" is "love... love" — not "Louie, Louie," much as I do love the idea of someone in the 16th century singing "Louie, Louie."

Later delightful quotes:

1656 S. Holland Don Zara i. vi. 57 That Gods may view, With a Dildo-doe, What we bake, and what we brew.
?1675–96 New made Medly compos'd out of Sundry Songs (single sheet) Old Obadiah sings Ave Maria, sing Lulla-by-Baby, with a Dildo....
1838 R. Southey Doctor V. 165 A story strange I will you tell..Of a woman that danced upon the rope, And so did her husband too: With a dildo, dildo, dildo, With a dildo, dildo, dee.

For the "object shaped like an erect penis," the oldest quote is from 1597, and the best quote is:

a1631 J. Donne Poems (1669) 67 She..Whom Dildoes, Bedstaves, or a velvet Glass Would be as loath to touch as Joseph was.

"Dildo" as a way to insult a person is as fresh today as it was in the 1600s:

1638 J. Ford Fancies iv. 54 The page a milke liverd Dildo....
2001 N. Weinstock As long as she needs Me 144 Marcy, get that dildo to wait another minute, will you? Get him some coffee. Spill water on him.

For a while, "dildo" was useful to refer to "A downward-hanging sausage curl on a wig."

1868 J. C. M. Bellew Poets' Corner 144 In Charles II.'s reign..the love-lock, or curl, was introduced, hanging from the nape of the neck between the shoulders. This was called the dildo, or pole-lock.

John Barth worked it into "The Sot-Weed Factor" (1960): "His wig was a campaigner, full but not extremely long, its tight curls terminating before either shoulder in pendulous corkscrewed dildos." Do people still read John Barth? It used to seem important. Post-modernism.

ADDED: I've quoted Wikipedia saying that "dildo" is "an insult for a 'contemptuous or reviling' male." That's miswritten. Surely, they meant to say it's an insult used to revile or express contempt for a man! The footnote there is to the OED, and the OED says "Originally as a general term of abuse for a boy or young man. In later use: a stupid, inept, or ridiculous person."

The “pedophile” slur, a companion of the term “groomer,” is regularly applied by Republicans and right-wing media figures to Democrats and others who stand up for transgender rights, including gender-affirming treatment for adolescents. Greene cheerfully flaunted this use of the term on “60 Minutes,” which left [Lesley] Stahl utterly flummoxed: 

Greene: Democrats support, even Joe Biden, the president himself, supports children being sexualized and having transgender surgeries. Sexualizing children is what pedophiles do to children. 

Stahl: Wow. Okay. But my question really is, can’t you fight for what you believe in without all that name-calling and without the personal attacks? 

Greene: Well, I would ask the same question to the other side … 

Not only did Greene casually conflate “sexualizing children” with transgender care, but she also is being despicably dishonest by reducing gender-affirming care to “surgeries.” Yet this conflation of support for trans youth with pedophilia slipped by, unrebutted, to a national audience. No wonder Greene told Semafor she was pleased with how the interview went.

Lesley Stahl initiated the topic and seemed to have thought that Greene would be flummoxed.* Was Stahl utterly unprepared for Greene to have an answer to the question why she'd used that word? Did CBS folk not game it out? It seems obvious to me that one predictable move was what Greene did: define "pedophile" broadly so that it's not limited to persons who have or desire to have sex with children.

It's like the way feminists refer to a "rape culture." It's not just about the malefactors who commit the specific crime, but about a larger system of creating risks and desires and vulnerability. Greene concisely stated the bold concept that sexualizing children is pedophilia.

Stahl should have been prepared for this. Perhaps she doesn't have what it takes to ask follow up questions. She reacted like a know-nothing: "Wow. Okay." And then she changed the subject to the general question whether name-calling — saying things like "pedophile" — is bad form! That's practically admitting Greene's epithet was accurate and then inquiring whether it should be avoided because it's mean!

And yet maybe Stahl made the right choice in not inquiring into why it's acceptable to conflate pedophilia and the sexualizing of children or whether what Democrats support deserves to be called the "sexualizing of children" or what transgender surgery has to do with sexualization. Majorie Taylor Greene gives forthright, strong answers, and Stahl would need to be sharp and articulate. She didn't even try.

Here's the full interview.

_______________________

* As I've noted on more than one occasion, "flummox" is my favorite word.